Top Tea Party Blogger Says Texas Senator Dan Patrick’s Tea Party Caucus Is Phony—Also Says Tea Party Followers Are Dupes If Loyal To GOP
I guess Mr. Patrick thinks the Tea Party can help him in some way.
Top Harris County Tea Party blogger Dave Jennings at Big Jolly Politics says this caucus is a bad idea.
Mr. Jennings says that Senator Patrick is just using the so-called Tea Party to serve his political purposes. Mr. Jennings says that once the Tea Party is of no further value to Senator Patrick, the Senator will move on to something else.
Here is a portion of what Mr. Jennings says—
“In other words, Tea Party peeps, you are going to be SORELY disappointed if you think that your support of Republicans is going to pay off in any big, fundamental way after the 2010 election. Yes, it will put a halt to President Obama’s largess in some areas but he’s still going to be playing golf and eating Kobe beef while an ever increasing number of Americans are on food stamps. And Republican leaders are going to fall all over themselves if he invites them to one of his parties….And for you tea parties that have basically sold yourselves to the Republican party, enjoy your lunches and handshakes with R’s because that is all you are going to get for your efforts.”
The Republican Party and the big business folks who own the Republican Party will take the efforts and energy of the Tea Party, but as soon as possible, they will go back to standard practices. They will have their hands out to government every chance they get for a heaping helping of tax dollars and government subsidies.
A few days ago, I wrote about how some elected Democrats support a policy on drug arrests that needlessly ruins the lives of hundreds of thousands of young minority men and women.
Many elected Democrats are decent people who want a better world. Yet the facts are that even Democrats will sell their own people, in a quite literal fashion, down the river.
You’ve got be involved and you have to remain aware.
While I have nothing at all for the Tea Party or for the Republican Party, what Mr. Jennings and I am are saying strike a similar note.
Below is analysis and a transcript of upcoming debate over the appointment of Judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court.
“Blah Blah Blah.”
She’ll legislate from the bench. She’s an activist judge. She’s a liberal.
Blah Blah Blah.
Same stuff every time.
(Above–Robert Bork with Ronald Reagan. Mr. Bork was, thankfully, rejected for the court.)
President Obama has said he’s looking for a mix of real-life experience and knowledge of the law for the Supreme Court.
It’s seems that this is just what he’s found.
I’m not saying you should not read about Judge Sotomayor. You should. Here’s a good story to get started.
What I’m saying is that instead of following the moronic debate that will end with Judge Sotomayor being confirmed, one could learn about the history of the court and gain some context beyond the same old junk.
You won’t learn this stuff in school, on CNN or with a Twitter message. You’ll have to learn it on your own.
In many respects, the best sources remain books, a good daily newspaper and your own hard work.
(Below–The great Chief Justice Earl Warren.)