I Apologize For Ever Having Voted For Houston Councilmember C.O. Bradford—Bradford Merits No Support From Voters Of Either Major Party
I apologize for ever having voted for Houston City Councilmember C.O Bradford.
I made this error when I voted for Mr. Bradford in 2008 to be Harris County District Attorney.
Mr. Bradford, a former Houston Police Chief, was the Democratic nominee for District Attorney.
I voted based on party when I should have simply not voted in the D.A. race. Neither candidate was worthy of support in that race.
While he did sound like a Democrat in 2008, Chief Bradford admitted at the time that he did not do all he could have done as Chief to deal with the deeply-flawed Houston crime lab.
As a current member of Houston City Council, Mr. Bradford often makes little effort to sound like a Democrat anymore. This despite the fact he was happy to take Democratic votes in 2008.
‘The City of Houston tends to over regulate. Understandably, the City must regulate from time to time for health and safety reasons. Even these interventions should be a limited, measured approach with broad substantive input from the citizens and businesses being impacted. Today, businesses and citizens are strapped with too many taxes, fees, and permitting requirements. Why is this so? Well, the answer can be found in one word – “spending. …”
I’m certain many would agree with this statement. Fine. But Democrats believe government has a role in making our communities better, and in making the lives of our citizens better. I’m sure folks who agree with Mr. Bradford’s minimal government views can find a real Republican to support.
You can be a Democrat and favor fiscal restraint. Nobody is in favor of waste. We do not have unlimited cash to run government. Yet what Mr. Bradford is doing here is identifying himself with the extreme and harmful budget cutting advocated by many in the current political climate, and offering nothing constructive for Democrats looking for fiscal moderation, but not looking to be Republicans. If given the choice between a Republican and a Republican—People will pick a Republican.
Mr. Bradford, as a Democrat, has the obligation to offer more than just a reflexive opposition to spending.
Now Mr. Bradford is teaming up with Republicans and others to attack the storm water drainage fee that Houston voters passed at the ballot box last November.
Some are upset that churches will have to pay a fair share of the fees required to address chronic flooding in Houston.
Councilman Bradford will be appearing with conservative Houston Councilmember Mike Sullivan and conservative Paul Bettencourt as panelists at a Houston Area Pastor Council meeting about the storm water fee.
This meeting will be held at Houston’s First Baptist Church. According to the Houston Chronicle, First Baptist is currently spending $12.6 million to renovate a Worship Center and $3 million to upgrade other facilities.
Mr. Bettencourt is best known for being reelected as Harris County Tax-Assessor Collector in 2008, and then quitting the post just a few weeks after the election.
That is some company Democrat C.O. Bradford keeps.
It is not clear why Mr. Bradford opposes the storm water fee given that he said the following on his campaign page—
“…. Let’s get back to a commitment to basic sanitation (garbage & water), infrastructure issues, police and fire. Core services are the City of Houston’s business!”
What is more basic to a hurricane -prone semi-tropical place like Houston than addressing flooding with new storm water infrastructure?
Mr. Bradford is not saying one way or another.
Which political party does Mr. Bradford truly support? Which city services does he see as essential? What are his political motives?
The only thing you can be certain of is that Councilman Bradford does not merit the support of any principled voter.